<$BlogRSDUrl$>

3.27.2006

This explains it…
8 March 2006

From my erstwhile daddy-in-law, comes this missive/poem that I did not write but thought was funny.

Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him,
a bad guy when Bush’s daddy made war on him,
a good guy when Cheney did business with him
and a bad guy when Bush needed a “we can’t find Bin Laden” diversion.

Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is communist,
but trade with China and Vietnam is vital
to a spirit of international harmony.
(…..and good business)

A woman can’t be trusted with decisions about her own
body, but multinational corporations can make
decisions affecting all mankind without regulation.

Jesus loves you and shares your hatred of
homosexuals and Hillary Clinton.

The best way to improve military morale is to praise
the troops in speeches while slashing veterans’
benefits and combat pay.

If condoms are kept out of schools,
adolescents won’t have sex.

Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy.
Providing health care to all Americans is socialism.

HMO’s and insurance companies have the best interests
of the public at heart.

Global warming and tobacco’s link to cancer are junk
science but creationism should be taught in schools.

A president lying about an extramarital affair
is an impeachable offense.
A president lying to enlist support for a war
in which thousands die is solid defense policy.

Government should limit itself to the powers named in
the Constitution,which include banning gay marriages
and censoring the Internet.

The public has a right to know about Hillary’s cattle trades,
but George Bush’s cocaine conviction is none of our business.

Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime,
unless you’re a conservative radio host.
Then it’s an illness and you need our prayers for your recovery.

What Bill Clinton did in the 1960’s is of vital
national interest, but what Bush did in the ’80’s is irrelevant.
********************************************************
From URL: http://sue.polinsky.com/?p=1686

3.21.2006


Killing Women & Children:
The “My Lai Phase”
Of The Iraq War

By Mike Whitney

03/20/06 "ICH"
-- -- What goes through George Bush’s mind when he sees the dead bodies of Iraqi women and children loaded on the back of a pickup truck like garbage? Is there ever a flicker of remorse; a split-second when he fully grasps the magnitude of the horror he has created? March 15 was another defining moment in America’s downward moral-spiral in Iraq. Eleven members of an Iraqi family were killed in a wanton act of slaughter executed by American occupiers. Photos taken at the scene show the lifeless bodies of young children, barely old enough to walk, lying motionless in the back of a flatbed truck while their fathers moan inconsolably at their side. What parent can look at these photographs and not be consumed with rage? The US military openly admits it attacked the house in Ishaqi where the incident took place. Reuters reports that, “Major Ali Ahmed of the Ishaqi police said US forces landed on the roof of the house in the early hours and shot the 11 occupants, including five children.” “After they left the house they blew it up”, he said. “The bodies, their hands bound, had been dumped in one room before the house was destroyed,” (policeman) Hussein said. Police had found spent American issue cartridges in the rubble.” (Reuters) The autopsy report at the Tikrit hospital said, “All the victims had gunshot wounds to the head”. Iraqi policeman Farouq Hussein noted, “It is a clear and perfect crime without any doubt”. The evidence provided by Reuters suggests that we have entered the “My Lai phase” of the Iraq war, where the pretensions about democracy and liberation are stripped-away and replaced with the gratuitous butchery of women and children. The carnage in Ishaqi illustrates the growing recklessness and desperation of Washington’s failed crusade. Military spokesman Major Tim O’ Keefe justified the attack saying they were searching for “a foreign fighter facilitator” for Al Qaida in Iraq. He added, “Troops were engaged by enemy fire as they approached the building. Coalition Forces returned fire utilizing both air and ground assets….Two women and one child were killed. The building was destroyed.” In fact, 11 women and children were killed and there’s no evidence to verify that the house was being used as an Al Qaida safe-house. The US military made similar claims after bombing raids in January and December when a total of 17 family members were killed. The grim fact is that is that the lives of Iraqi women and children are of no real consequence to US officials. As General Tommy Franks boasted, “We don’t do body counts”. The victims of American aggression are simply dismissed as collateral damage undeserving of any further acknowledgement. The story has received scant attention in the establishment media, which prefers to highlight the stumbling oratory of our Dear Leader as he reaffirms our commitment to western “pro-life” values. In truth, George Bush is as responsible for the deaths of those children as if he had put a gun to their heads himself and shot them one by one. At present, we have no way of knowing how frequently these attacks on civilians are taking place. The Pentagon strategy of removing independent journalists from the battlefield has created a news-vacuum that makes it impossible to know with confidence the extent of the casualties or the level of the devastation. The few incidents like this that find their way into the mainstream create a troubling picture of military adventurism and brutality that is no longer anchored to any identifiable moral principle or vision of resolution. It is simply violence randomly dispersed on a massive scale; traumatizing the Iraqi people and bringing the United States into greater disrepute. There were no Al Qaida fighters in the home in Ishaqi. The attack was just another lethal blunder by a blinkered military fighting an invisible enemy. “The killed family was not part of the resistance; they were women and children,” said Ahmed Khalaf. “The Americans promised us a better life, but we only get death.”
*************************************************************************************
FROM - INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE
URL: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12404.htm#one